Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
-23% $13.79$13.79
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$7.98$7.98
$3.99 delivery May 20 - 24
Ships from: ECOMMERCE NORTH DAKOTA Sold by: ECOMMERCE NORTH DAKOTA
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Audible sample Sample
The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct Paperback – February 23, 2010
Purchase options and add-ons
“The landmark book that argued that psychiatry consistently expands its definition of mental illness to impose its authority over moral and cultural conflict.” — New York Times
The 50th anniversary edition of the most influential critique of psychiatry every written, with a new preface on the age of Prozac and Ritalin and the rise of designer drugs, plus two bonus essays.
Thomas Szasz's classic book revolutionized thinking about the nature of the psychiatric profession and the moral implications of its practices. By diagnosing unwanted behavior as mental illness, psychiatrists, Szasz argues, absolve individuals of responsibility for their actions and instead blame their alleged illness. He also critiques Freudian psychology as a pseudoscience and warns against the dangerous overreach of psychiatry into all aspects of modern life.
- Print length368 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateFebruary 23, 2010
- Dimensions5.31 x 0.83 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100061771228
- ISBN-13978-0061771224
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
“The landmark book that argued that psychiatry consistently expands its definition of mental illness to impose its authority over moral and cultural conflict.” — New York Times
“Enormously courageous and highly infomative, and it makes fascinating reading . . . bold and often brilliant.” — Science
“Controversial and influential . . . an iconoclastic work.” — Joyce Carol Oates, New York Times Book Review
“Szasz’s radical views on mental illness and drug addiction have been presented with great consistency and courage . . . I predict that Dr. Szasz’s work and thought will once again come to the fore: he takes the long view.” — Will Self, The Times (London)
“A classic.” — Salon.com
“A damning critique of mental illness . . . a classic work.” — Toronto Star
“Quite probably, Szasz has done more than any other man to alert the American public to the potential dangers of an excessively psychiatrized society.” — Atlantic Monthly
From the Back Cover
50th Anniversary Edition With a New Preface and Two Bonus Essays
The most influential critique of psychiatry ever written, Thomas Szasz's classic book revolutionized thinking about the nature of the psychiatric profession and the moral implications of its practices. By diagnosing unwanted behavior as mental illness, psychiatrists, Szasz argues, absolve individuals of responsibility for their actions and instead blame their alleged illness. He also critiques Freudian psychology as a pseudoscience and warns against the dangerous overreach of psychiatry into all aspects of modern life.
About the Author
Thomas S. Szasz, M.D., is professor emeritus of psychiatry at the State University of New York in Syracuse, where he has taught since 1956.
Product details
- Publisher : Harper Perennial; Anniversary edition (February 23, 2010)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 368 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0061771228
- ISBN-13 : 978-0061771224
- Item Weight : 9.5 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.31 x 0.83 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #30,549 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #5 in Popular Psychology Mental Illness Books
- #13 in Medical Mental Illness
- #154 in Popular Psychology Pathologies
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Some quotes:
"I wish...to reintroduce freedom, choice and responsibility into the conceptual framework and vocabulary of psychiatry."
"Mental illness is not something a person has, but is something he does or is."
"...little doubt...that both Freud and Sullivan were correct in identifying painful memories, their repression, and their persistent operation, as significant antecedents in the personal and social behavior of hysterically disabled individuals."
"An integral part of this scientific ethic is the principle that knowledge...must not...be kept a secret by a small group and used as a source of power to mystify and control, stupefy and dominate, other individuals or groups."
"It is important to understand clearly that modern psychiatry - and the identification of new psychiatric diseases - began not by identifying such diseases by means of established methods of pathology, but by creating a new criterion of what constitutes disease."
"The reclassification of non-illnesses as illnesses has, of course, been of special value to physicians and to psychiatry as a profession and social institution. The prestige and power of psychiatrists have been inflated by defining ever more phenomena as falling within the purview of their discipline."
"The phenomenology of body illness is indeed independent of the socioeconomic and political character of the society in which it occurs. But this is emphatically not true for the phenomenology of so-called mental illness, whose manifestations depend upon and vary with the educational, economic, religious, social, and political character of the individual and society in which it occurs."
"...To exhibit, by means of bodily signs - say, by paralyses or convulsions - the idea and message that one is sick is at once more impressive and more informative than simply saying: `I am sick.'"
"(Some) religious teachings...reward sickness and stupidity, poverty and timidity - in short, disabilities of all sorts..." "...the sick person is entitled to help simply because he is sick..."
"...the obligatory nature of the care required generates a feeling of helplessness in the person from whom help is sought. If a person cannot, in good conscience, refuse to provide help - and cannot even stipulate the terms on which he will supply it - then truly he becomes the help-seeker's slave."
"...the hysteric plays at being sick because he is afraid that, if he tried to participate competently in certain real-life activities, he would fail."
"The hysteric's seeming ignorance of what he is doing may also be interpreted as his not being able to afford to know it..."
"...It is precisely those who play these games (of hysteria and mental illness) most skillfully whose performances are likely to prove successful and whose identities will therefore be authenticated as sick..."
"The principal alternative to this dilemma lies...in abolishing the categories of ill and healthy behavior..."
"...even if one could brush aside the pathogenic or pathologic mechanisms, one would have persons who are not at all well-suited to a complex interpersonal environment..."
"...(The) Ganser syndrome... is the strategic impersonation of madness by a prisoner...the patient, being under charges from which he would be exonerated were he irresponsible, begins, without being aware of the fact, to appear irresponsible."
"In the case of malingering, hysteria, and the Ganser syndrome - and, indeed, in all cases of so-called mental illness - psychiatrists actually confirm the patient's self-definition as ill and so help to shape his illness."
"...let me emphasize only that investing hope in religious faith is perhaps one of the best psychological investments a person can make..."
"In the individualistic, autonomous "psychotherapy" which I prefer, the patient himself defines what is good or bad, sick or healthy."
"...our goal should be to enlarge his (the patient's) choices by enhancing his knowledge of himself, others, and the world about him, and his skills in dealing with persons and things."
Comments:
One can take inspiration from the prescient application of Szasz' theory in Helen Keller's story, wherein her live-in teacher, who never heard of Szasz, challenged family opposition and transformed, Helen, who had neither vision, nor hearing, nor speech, nor discipline, into an educated individual superbly valuable to herself and to her society. Surely today's professionals would find her superbly diagnosable.
I believe that the case workers, nurses, social workers, ward assistants, housekeepers etc. have been, to varying degrees using Szasz' principles all along. And Glasser seems to have capitalized on this as expressed in his 1965 book, Reality Therapy. All personnel who had any contact with his confined patients were required to attend the meetings. Teamworking, they realized remarkable success.
My sister, before her passing with cancer in 1991, had been a housekeeper at Maryland's Springfield State Mental Hospital for about 20 years. Fed-up with mopping up one patient's urine she decided to teach this, no doubt "exquisitely diagnosed," individual how to use a urinal. It was easy, and that solved the problem. And, she conducted a spiritual group for the patients, and she counseled them individually, and, in some cases, she had more success than the professionals with enabling them to return home.
Hopefully Szasz' and others' illustrations of psychiatrists' huge cost to our society, combined with the present declines in mental health care funding, will eventually lead us to no longer simple-mindedly admire or gloat about our young who obediently strive to become doctors (perhaps psychiatrists).
There should someday exist a book version for the cognitively-disabled, the less educated and the less-English-language-competent.
It was painful chopping 5000 words out of my booknotes to write this 1000-word review. A wealth of critical information not here is in the book.
Bill Norwood
I've had some time off recently, so I wanted to really investigate the science behind my disorder. I started with two books on mental health policy over the past 50 years ( "American Psychosis" for a negative take, and "Better but Not Well" for a more positive, mainstream take), then I read the latest psychiatric information about the disorder- the suspected genetic causes , the brain chemistry approach, the neurological evidence from the official peer-reviewed literature. I altogether found it unsatisfying. Everywhere I turned, it was always "While the specific mechanism is unknown, it is believed..." or "While specific genes cannot be found, it does seem to run in families..." Even the neurological explanation didn't seem able to distinguish cause from effect, or come up with any predictive mechanism. I began to really question the mainstream, so I read "Anatomy of an Epidemic", which was an excellent summary of all the research showing that the brain-chemistry model is ineffective. I even investigated my own medication, and found that Lamictal, the primary drug of choice for bipolar treatment, was found to be ineffective in 7 out of 9 clinical trials ( Of course GSK only published the positive two).
All Thomas Szasz really says here is that we can't view mental illness, that is to say, the major mood disorders and psychoses, as normal diseases. We can't pretend that mental illness is some exogenous force that is totally irrelevant of the victim's life experiences, the victims traumas and tragedies, and the victim's behaviors. In fact, new research into the pscychosocial explanation finds very strong evidence for the importance of these things in predicting the incidence of mental illness. And if its true, as Szasz argues, that there is this very strong psychosocial element, then therapy to understand these issues and perceptions and to allow the patient to change behavior is the best option for treatment. Again, research shows the efficacy of Psychotherapy in general as well as CBT specifically.
Finally, I can say he is 100% correct in his assertion that much of psychiatry is inhumane. Involuntary treatment, and even the attitude that certain ways of life are "right" and other ways "bad," are means of controlling people. They are a way for society to get rid of undesirables and call it compassion, and on the other side, an escape valve for the oppressed. A key piece of evidence for this is that "homosexuality" was a mental illness for a long time, something we would scoff at now; that was a means of social control, not a means of helping the patient. Healing can only occur in an atmosphere of respect and dignity, where the doctor respects the patient's rights and autonomy, and where the patient takes responsibility.
The book is quite plodding at points, but if you skip his abstract explanations and jump straight to the examples he gives, it is very clear. While I'm not convinced that all mental illness is purely a construction, I think Szasz hits the nail on the head for the general direction Psychiatry has moved.
Top reviews from other countries
So, is this passage really endorsing the "sick, poor, dependent, and humble"? Let's find out.
In this passage (Mat. 19:16-26), it should be known that only God is good. Only God, and not good works, is the only source of eternal life. In dictating to "keep the commandments" Jesus wants people to recognize that they are sinners. No one, except Jesus, could be able to keep the commandments of the law. The commandments only serve to reveal sin. They are not to be fulfilled or please God. In verse 21, Jesus now reveals the problem of that specific man: because of his greed he did not keep the commandments. This demand of Jesus is NOT an absolute requirement for discipleship (Zacchaeus offering only half of his possessions; Luke 19:8-9). There is nothing in this entire passage that refers to "sickness" or claims of lack of health.
However, Christ can rightfully make requisitions in regard to giving up earthly possessions and distributing them as donations, in short, Jesus can denounce anything that prevents the person from recognizing himself as a sinner and criminal before God, and assume that divine wrath was poured out on the cross for his/her injustices.
The central point of Jesus is that wealth gives a false sense of security in this life, which prevents the tranquility granted by a spiritual state of surrender.
Finally, Jesus demanded that the young man sell his things, not give them away! For me, this is a clear invitation to the free market and philanthropy. Here Szasz assumes without any justification that not being "wealthy" is in some way humiliating, "painful" and "self-damaging". Nowhere can we see Jesus demanding that men must be "sick, poor, dependent, humble".
Then, Szasz quotes the famous, and often misinterpreted, sermon on the Mount as illustrating Bible rules "fostering dependency and disability". He says: "This passage articulates most clearly the basic rules by which the Christian God plays His game with Man". First of all, Szasz "paraphrases" the passage from Matt. 5:1-12. His resulting interpretation is, then, that man should be "stupid, submissive, not smart, well-informed, or assertive; passive, weak, not self-reliant; naive, unquestioningly loyal and no entertain doubt".
Okay, first of all, Szasz eliminates the word "Blessed" to fit his narrative, and this is because in each case Jesus says that those whom the world considers unhappy or unlucky are actually blessed because a reward awaits them. Jesus describes the characteristics of those who will inherit the kingdom of heaven because they respond to the gospel with faith. Here the poor, what they do not have is the egoism and arrogance of people like Szasz who believe that their efforts and merits have given them a special social position.
By "meek" Jesus is referring to those who are not arrogant because they understand that they are sinners, not better than anyone else and that only through repentance and faith can they be saved.
By "pure of heart" Jesus is referring to those whose sins have been forgiven through the sacrifice of Christ when he received all the divine justice and punishment that all sinners deserved.
So, NO, Jesus never claimed anything that Szasz mentioned. In fact, it is Sasz who is naive, pusillanimous, and emotional, just like Freud, Sartre, and Nietzsche.