Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
-16% $18.49$18.49
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$17.03$17.03
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: CurrentlyKimmy
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Miller's Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers Paperback – February 1, 2016
Purchase options and add-ons
Many people sincerely believe that all vaccines are safe, adverse reactions are rare, and no peer-reviewed scientific studies exist showing that vaccines can cause harm. This book — Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies — provides the other side of the story that is not commonly told. It contains summaries of 400 important scientific papers to help parents and researchers enhance their understanding of vaccinations.
"This book should be required reading for every doctor, medical student and parent. Reading this book will allow you to make better choices when considering vaccination." — David Brownstein, MD
"This book is so precise and exciting in addressing the vaccine controversy that I read it in one evening. I recommend this book to any parent who has questions about vaccines and wants to be factually educated to make informed decisions." — Gabriel Cousens, MD
"Neil Miller’s book is a tour de force and a clarion voice championing the cautionary principle: ‘When in doubt, minimize risk.’ Let’s talk science. Read this book. The truth will keep you and your children protected."— Bradford S. Weeks, MD
"Nowhere else can one find such an organized and concise compilation of research on vaccines. Not only does Miller have a deep understanding of science and the issues at hand, he has made this book easy to reference and cite. Truly, there is no other guide out there quite like it. For everyone who contacts me in the future seeking scientific evidence about vaccines, I will recommend Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies." — Toni Bark, MD, MHEM, LEED AP, previous Director of the pediatric ER at Michael Reese Hospital
"Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies is the most comprehensive and coherent accumulation of peer-reviewed research on vaccine issues and natural immunity I have ever come across. A must read for parents, teachers, doctors and other healthcare providers." — Dr. Tyson Perez, pediatric chiropractor
- Print length336 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherNew Atlantean Press
- Publication dateFebruary 1, 2016
- Dimensions6 x 0.8 x 8.9 inches
- ISBN-10188121740X
- ISBN-13978-1881217404
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
- WHAT YOUR DOCTOR MAY NOT TELL YOU ABOUT (TM): CHILDREN'S VACCINATIONSStephanie Cave MD FAAFPPaperback
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Neil Z. Miller is a medical research journalist and Director of the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute. He has devoted the past 25 years to educating parents and health practitioners about vaccines, encouraging informed consent and non-mandatory laws. He is the author of several professional scientific papers and books on vaccines, including Miller's Review of Critical Vaccine Studies (2016), Vaccine Safety Manual for Concerned Families and Health Practitioners, Make an Informed Vaccine Decision for the Health of Your Child (with Dr. Mayer Eisenstein) and Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective? Past organizations that he has lectured for include the International Chiropractic Pediatric Association, the International College of Integrative Medicine, Autism One, Maximized Living, and the Culture of Life Institute. Mr. Miller has a degree in psychology and is a member of Mensa. He lives in Northern New Mexico.
Product details
- Publisher : New Atlantean Press; 1st edition (February 1, 2016)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 336 pages
- ISBN-10 : 188121740X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1881217404
- Item Weight : 2.31 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.8 x 8.9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #6,260 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3 in Health Policy (Books)
- #6 in Vaccinations
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Not according to the CDC’s own studies and not according to hundreds of other studies conducted around the world.
Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies summarizes the findings of 400 vaccine-related scientific papers. Considered one by one, the findings are disturbing. For example:
“Thimerosal-containing vaccines continue to be administered on a regular basis to potentially the most vulnerable populations: pregnant women and children (especially in developing countries). Given this, we believe it is high time to reassess the rationale for using thimerosal, a known immune and neurotoxic substance, in human vaccines.”
(Tomljenovic Ll, Dorea JG, et al. Commentary: a link between mercury exposure, autism spectrum disorder, and other neurodevelopmental disorders: Implications for thimerosal-containing vaccines. Journal on Developmental Disabilities 2012; 18(1):34-42.
“Evidence has now emerged showing that autism may in part result from early-life immune insults induced by environmental xenobiotics. One of the most common xenobiotic with immune-stimulating as well as neurotoxic properties to which infants under two years of age are routinely exposed worldwide is the aluminum vaccine adjuvant.”
(Shaw CA, Sheth S, et al. Etiology of autism spectrum disorders: genes, environment, or both? OA Autism 2014 Jun 10; 2(2): 11.
“The yearly U.S. mass influenza vaccination campaign has been ineffective in preventing influenza in vaccine recipients. Vaccine recipients need to be informed of the limitations and risks of the vaccine and of the alternatives to vaccination. In particular, they need to know of the possibility that repeated vaccinations may increase the risk of adverse effects.”
(Geier DA, King PG, et al. Influenza vaccine: review of effectiveness of the U.S. immunization program, and policy considerations. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 2006 Fall; 11(3): 69-74.)
“Under universal varicella vaccination, there has been a vaccine-induced decline in exogenous boosting. We estimate universal varicella vaccination has the impact of an additional 14.6 million herpes-zoster cases among adults aged under 50 years during a 50-year time span at a substantial cost burden of 4.1 billion U.S. dollars or 80 million U.S. dollars annually.”
(Goldman GS. Cost-benefit analysis of universal varicella vaccination in the U.S. taking into account the closely related herpes-zoster epidemiology. Vaccine 2005 May 9; 23(25): 3349-55.)
Most disturbing are the numerous studies cited in Miller’s book that expose the truth about pro-vaccine “science.” Following are a few examples:
“Vaccine manufacturers have financial motives and public health officials have bureaucratic reasons that might lead them to sponsor research that concludes vaccines are safe.”
(DeLong G. Conflicts of interest in vaccine safety research. Account Res 2012; 19(2): 65-88.)
“For most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias.”
(Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PloS Med 2005 Aug; 2(8): e124.)
“The CDC’s image as an independent watchdog over the public health has given it enormous prestige, and its recommendations are occasionally enforced by law. Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.”
(Lenzer J. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: protecting the private good? BMJ 2015 May 15; 350; h2362.)
When considered as a whole, Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies exposes the people who shape the vaccine paradigm for what they are: self-serving criminals pumping out chemical cocktails based on fraudulent research operating within a liability-free industry/governmental relationship who are more than willing to injure or kill you and your children to maximize current and future profits.
Whether you use Miller’s book to inform your vaccine-related decisions or to inform your legislators’ vaccine-related votes, Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies will serve as one of your most valuable resources.
Brett Wilcox, author, We’re Monsanto: Feeding the World, Lie After Lie, Books 1 and 2
To me any chapters in the book were interesting to read, but among other “funny” to read the chapter 22, “Non-Vaccination by Doctors and Nurses”, where we realize that most of the persons who vaccinate other persons, and/or are highly educated, actually are those who is less interesting in being vaccinated, and especially not having their children vaccinated. By their working with vaccination, they have realized its backsides.
Actually, before starting reading in this book, I just finished quite a bit of books about the vitamin D, and vitamin A, and among other how FDA and the medicine producers, way back in 1937, after a 9-year research results, which showed how fantastic healthy these 2 vitamins are making the users, how they, among other, tried to make selling illegal. For thereby by the producers to have made expensive drugs containing vitamins A and D, and to be sold by prescription.
So, in the actual 2 chapters in the book, it was interesting again to read about these vitamins, and especially looking at reports result about the close connection between sun (vitamin D) and influenza, there on the side 263, about the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic, the Spanish disease, how the disease was more seldom in Texas than in New London. And on side 266 in a Norwegian report the conclusion that nearly all of the influence pneumonia only happening when in the winter getting no sun. So, vitamin D (D3 best) is the best protection against influenza. Interesting to know when now we are speculation about how to protect against the Covid-19.
On the side 20 we read about how WHO, which for saving 15 cent per vaccine, uses a vaccine which contains the bad mercury. And at other sides we read about that the aluminum i vaccines can result in autism.
On many of the pages in we read about the vaccination given to the newborn, or less than 2-year-old children, that is about chance for disease problems later in life. And in this case among other looked at the problem if the actual vaccines were taken later than told, for example in the first months after birth, or if not 4 vaccines were injected together, but separately, and the results showed that best if late and separately. And the reports also show that for vaccinated children, there have been more hospital health visit, than for the not vaccinated. And even this, more death among the vaccinated than the not vaccinated.
Concerning possibly side problems as result of vaccination, it’s worst to read the chapter 9, about the vaccine for 9- to 26-year-old girls, against “Human Papillomavirus (HPV)”, which in 2006 was approved by FDA. In my eyes worst if we look at which diseases that the vaccine can result, actually: multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, paralysis, convulsion, chronic fatigue syndrome, anaphylaxis, pulmonary embolisms and dead. It’s not written in the book, but actually the vaccine has shown up to be less effective than pap screening by the Pap test. So why do FDA approve this vaccine, if it’s not for helping the producers?
I will give side copies to doctors which I meet, and actually I would like to buy a copy to the doctor university library, to where I have given many books, but actually I don’t think that it would be allowed to be in the library. I have discovered too much about the doctor education politic, missing knowledge, here I Chiang Mai
Top reviews from other countries
of the science behind vaccinations. Following vaccine damage to our son from the MMR vaccine, and also to my daughter from the DTP, and the subsequent extensive research I undertook, I completely reversed my previous pro-vaccine view. I used this book as part of my more recent research in deciding whether to allow our daughter to have any further vaccines including, MMR, only Measles and Rubella (privately) and tetanus (on its own privately) - and decided that for her, with her particular genetic make-up, the potential risks of MMR outweigh any potential benefits. Currently, I am not taking the other two options either. This book has been invaluable as part of my research but I would recommend anyone to not just rely on this. They should do their own research and read as widely as possible.
I believe that it is deeply concerning that attempts are being made (evidenced by press reports) to shut down debate and hide relevant information from the public, preventing concerned parents from accessing scientific information that does not support vaccinations on the pretext that it is pseudo-scientific and dangerous - when precisely the opposite is true! We would not wish anyone to have to go through what we as a family have had to endure and I believe it should be a basic human right to have access to all relevant information which could have a major and significant impact on our childrens' futures and health. It is frightening to think that even newspapers and the media are terrified to publish any story that could be construed as being anti-vaccine as they would be accused of endangering public health. I know this to be true from a journalist we know. So much for a free press ! My hope is that science correspondents for papers will start taking the time and trouble to carry out some thorough research into this all important area without simply relying on vested interests for their information- only then will at least some unbiased information become more readily available to the general public.