
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-57% $8.12$8.12
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Very Good
$6.90$6.90
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Jenson Books Inc

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know--And Doesn't Paperback – March 11, 2008
Purchase options and add-ons
The United States is one of the most religious places on earth, but it is also a nation of shocking religious illiteracy.
- Only 10 percent of American teenagers can name all five major world religions and 15 percent cannot name any.
- Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that the Bible holds the answers to all or most of life's basic questions, yet only half of American adults can name even one of the four gospels and most Americans cannot name the first book of the Bible.
Despite this lack of basic knowledge, politicians and pundits continue to root public policy arguments in religious rhetoric whose meanings are missed—or misinterpreted—by the vast majority of Americans.
"We have a major civic problem on our hands," says religion scholar Stephen Prothero. He makes the provocative case that to remedy this problem, we should return to teaching religion in the public schools. Alongside "reading, writing, and arithmetic," religion ought to become the "Fourth R" of American education.
Many believe that America's descent into religious illiteracy was the doing of activist judges and secularists hell-bent on banishing religion from the public square. Prothero reveals that this is a profound misunderstanding. "In one of the great ironies of American religious history," Prothero writes, "it was the nation's most fervent people of faith who steered us down the road to religious illiteracy. Just how that happened is one of the stories this book has to tell."
Prothero avoids the trap of religious relativism by addressing both the core tenets of the world's major religions and the real differences among them. Complete with a dictionary of the key beliefs, characters, and stories of Christianity, Islam, and other religions, Religious Literacy reveals what every American needs to know in order to confront the domestic and foreign challenges facing this country today.
- Print length371 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMarch 11, 2008
- Dimensions5.31 x 0.86 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100060859520
- ISBN-13978-0060859527
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
From the Publisher
![]()
God the Bestseller
|
![]()
God Is Not One
|
![]()
Religious Literacy
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Customer Reviews |
4.8 out of 5 stars 13
|
4.4 out of 5 stars 1,320
|
4.4 out of 5 stars 334
|
Price | $12.95$12.95 | $9.99$9.99 | $8.12$8.12 |
This title is a history of a nation, a publishing company, and a person who transformed the religious literary canon for years to come. | Contrary to what many popular religion writers say, Prothero shows how the world’s religions ask different questions, tackle different problems, and aim at different goals. | Prothero pinpoints key moments in American history that spawned the current epidemic of religious illiteracy, and practical solutions on how to gain it back. | |
Traces genealogy of works by Martin Luther King, Howard Thurman, Huston Smith, Dorothy Day, and Aldous Huxley | The book covers eight different religions: Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism, Confucianism, Yoruba Religion, Daoism, and Atheism | Includes Dictionary of Religious Literacy: key terms, beliefs, characters, and stories |
Editorial Reviews
Review
“This book is a must-read not only for educators, clergy and government officials, but for all adults.” — Publishers Weekly (starred review)
“Smart but gentle, loving but blunt, Prothero is uniquely qualified to guide us through the fraught fields of faith.” — Bruce Feiler, author of Walking the Bible and Where God Was Born
“A compelling, provocative, wholly innovative historical interpretation of the place of learning in American religious life. I love this book!” — Lauren F. Winner, author of Girl Meets God and Real Sex
“Provocative and timely . . . Combines a lively history with a set of proposed remedies.” — Washington Post Book World
“Remarkable...an especially deft examination of the reasons for Americans’ religious literacy.” — Washington Monthly
“Religious Literacy presents a compelling argument for Bible-literacy courses.” — Time magazine
“Prothero makes you want to go back to college ... a scholar with the soul of a late-night television comic.” — Newsweek
“Compelling and persuasively presented . . . a critical addition to the debate about teaching religion in public school.” — San Francisco Chronicle
“Prothero’s book can be recommended for its readability. It is constantly interesting, very well-written, and chock full of essential information about all religions…This could be one of the most important books to be published this year. It deserves serious attention.” — Journal of American Culture
From the Back Cover
The United States is one of the most religious places on earth, but it is also a nation of shocking religious illiteracy.
- Only 10 percent of American teenagers can name all five major world religions and 15 percent cannot name any.
- Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that the Bible holds the answers to all or most of life's basic questions, yet only half of American adults can name even one of the four gospels and most Americans cannot name the first book of the Bible.
Despite this lack of basic knowledge, politicians and pundits continue to root public policy arguments in religious rhetoric whose meanings are missed—or misinterpreted—by the vast majority of Americans.
"We have a major civic problem on our hands," says religion scholar Stephen Prothero. He makes the provocative case that to remedy this problem, we should return to teaching religion in the public schools. Alongside "reading, writing, and arithmetic," religion ought to become the "Fourth R" of American education.
Many believe that America's descent into religious illiteracy was the doing of activist judges and secularists hell-bent on banishing religion from the public square. Prothero reveals that this is a profound misunderstanding. "In one of the great ironies of American religious history," Prothero writes, "it was the nation's most fervent people of faith who steered us down the road to religious illiteracy. Just how that happened is one of the stories this book has to tell."
Prothero avoids the trap of religious relativism by addressing both the core tenets of the world's major religions and the real differences among them. Complete with a dictionary of the key beliefs, characters, and stories of Christianity, Islam, and other religions, Religious Literacy reveals what every American needs to know in order to confront the domestic and foreign challenges facing this country today.
About the Author
Stephen Prothero is the New York Times bestselling author of Religious Literacy and God Is Not One and a professor of religion at Boston University. His work has been featured on the cover of TIME magazine, The Oprah Winfrey Show, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, The Colbert Report, NPR, and other top national media outlets. He writes and reviews for the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe, The Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times, Salon, Slate, and other publications. Visit the author at www.stephenprothero.com or follow his tweets @sprothero.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Religious Literacy
What Every American Needs to Know--And Doesn'tBy Stephen ProtheroHarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
Copyright © 2008 Stephen ProtheroAll right reserved.
ISBN: 9780060859527
Chapter One
A Nation of Religious Illiterates
Both the Religious Right and the Secular Left feel besieged. In the Left Behind novels popular in conservative Christian circles, true believers are "raptured" into heaven at the end of times; everyone else is "left behind." Today secularists are attesting to a Last Days scenario of another sort, in which the old order of reason, rights, and the separation of church and state is being replaced by a new medievalism in which the president and his acolytes answer to God rather than to the American people. This disquiet can be heard in port cities across the country, but it is particularly palpable in Manhattan, the mecca of the Secular Left, where many report that their island is starting to feel, well, like an island again, cut off from the heartland by (among other things) its cosmopolitanism. At least for New Yorkers, it is as if the iconic Saul Steinberg cartoon of the United States according to Manhattan—an image that looks west across Ninth Avenue and the Hudson River and New Jersey to a Kansas City the size of a yellow cab and a Los Angeles no bigger than a courier's bicycle—is eerily mutating into a Grant Wood landscape, its bucolic foreground anchored not by yellow cabs but by the corn rows and church spires of Kansas, with nary a skyscraper on the horizon. "I feel assaulted," one New Yorker told me. "I feel like these Christians are hiding a crucifix in their shoe. Any minute they'll pull it out and gut you."28
Bill O'Reilly of The O'Reilly Factor on Fox News feels assaulted too. Whereas secularists are sure that the Religious Right has taken over US politics, he is morally certain that "secular progressives" are winning the culture wars. Christmas is "under siege," O'Reilly says. An "anti-Christian jihad" is banishing Christmas trees from holiday parades, Christmas carols from public school pageants, and Christmas greetings from department stores. In the world according to O'Reilly, the ultimate aim of these criminalizers of Christmas is nothing less than banishing religion from the public square and thereby clearing the way for "secular progressive programs like legalization of narcotics, euthanasia, abortion at will, gay marriage." Televangelist Jerry Falwell also believes that "radical secularists" are "aggressively attempting to redefine America in their own Godless image," and religious broadcaster Pat Buchanan complains about "hate crimes against Christianity." The mission of the Secular Left, concludes Buchanan, is "to expunge from the public life of the West all reminders that ours was once a Christian civilization and America once a Christian country."29
The emotions on both sides of this question are understandable, though the irony of the situation—in which each camp sees itself as a victim and believes that the other is seizing control of the country—seems lost on everyone concerned. The fact of the matter is that, in the American marketplace of ideas, neither faith nor faithlessness is close to either bankruptcy or monopoly. Though O'Reilly may rage, Christmas (which remains a national holiday) is not fading into that good night. And theocracy—in the true sense of church-run government—is not even a twinkle in the Bush administration's eye. Much ink has been spilled, and many megabytes expended, trying to pigeonhole the nation into either "secular America" or "Christian America." It has always been both.
The United States is by law a secular country. God is not mentioned in the Constitution, and the First Amendment's establishment clause forbids the state from getting into the church business. However, that same amendment also includes a free exercise clause safeguarding religious liberty, and Americans have long exercised this liberty by praying to God, donating to religious congregations, and hoping for heaven. So there is logic not only to President John Adams's affirmation in the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796 that "the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion" but also to the Supreme Court's 1892 observation that "this is a Christian nation." In short, the long-standing debate about whether the United States is secular or religious is fundamentally confused. Thanks to the establishment clause, the US government is secular by law; thanks to the free exercise clause, American society is religious by choice.30
Ever since George Washington put his hand on a Bible and swore to uphold a godless Constitution, the United States has been both staunchly secular and resolutely religious. Church and state have never been completely separated in the United States; religion and politics were bedfellows from the start. Traditional liberals such as the political philosopher John Rawls insist that religion restrict itself to the individual heart, the pious home, and the religious congregation; religion is a private matter that will contaminate civil society if not quarantined from public life. Because religion is a "conversation stopper," political discourse must be conducted entirely in terms of "public reason," which by definition excludes religious reasons. According to this strict separationist perspective, the wall between church and state is supposed to form, as one nineteenth-century activist once put it, "a barrier high and eternal as the Andes." The only alternative is "politics as holy war."31
George W. Bush caught a lot of flak for disrespecting this church-state divide at his 2001 inauguration, which included one prayer offered by the Reverend Franklin Graham (Billy's son) in the name of "the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit" and another offered by the United Methodist minister Kirbyjon Caldwell "in the name that's above all other names, Jesus, the Christ." But Bush's sin was also committed, in flagrante delicto, by Bill Clinton, whose inaugurations were unabashedly Christian affairs. Clinton's 1997 fete included a trinitarian prayer by Billy Graham, a benediction by a black Baptist preacher, and songs by no fewer than three gospel groups (one called the Resurrection Choir). Plainly, the celebrated wall of separation between church and state has never been particularly wide or sturdy. Breached nearly as often as it has been respected, this wall resembles a rickety picket fence far more than the eternal Andes. Washington and Madison, Reagan and Clinton all declared national days of prayer or thanksgiving, and the Supreme Court still opens its sessions with "God save the United States and this Honorable Court." As G. K. Chesterton once put it, the United States has long been "a nation with the soul of a church."32
Continues...
Excerpted from Religious Literacyby Stephen Prothero Copyright © 2008 by Stephen Prothero. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- Publisher : HarperOne; Reprint edition (March 11, 2008)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 371 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0060859520
- ISBN-13 : 978-0060859527
- Item Weight : 11.9 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.31 x 0.86 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #521,320 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #672 in Comparative Religion (Books)
- #874 in History of Religions
- #2,292 in History of Christianity (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Stephen Prothero is the New York Times bestselling author of Religious Literacy and chair of the religion department at Boston University. His work has been featured on the cover of Time magazine, Oprah, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, National Public Radio, and other top national media outlets. He writes and reviews for The New York Times Magazine, Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe, Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times, Salon, and other publications. He holds degrees in American Religion from Harvard and Yale.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find this book to be a good source of information about various religious thought, providing a succinct overview of major world religions. They appreciate its readability, describing it as an excellent resource for adults. The writing quality receives positive feedback, with customers noting it is well written and easy to read.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find the book provides a good source for overall understanding, offering a highly detailed and succinct overview of major world religions, making it particularly suitable for novice religion enthusiasts.
"...I think that the book actually tells us that there are many facts, mainly and mostly historical, that we actually ignore about our nation, the way..." Read more
"...Also, for me, this book also explains a lot of things that I have encountered, which are basically facets of the growing state of American anti-..." Read more
"Reading, Writing, Arithmetic and Religion. When I was in elementary school, I often asked, "Why do I have to do this?"..." Read more
"Prothero is a genius! He writes well, has a new "paradigm" for study of comparative religions..." Read more
Customers find the book readable and engaging, describing it as a must-read that serves as an excellent resource for adults.
"What a fantastic book!..." Read more
"I haven’t actually finished reading this book but it is very interesting so far. Maybe I’ll modify my review once I finish it." Read more
"...The author is able to engage the reader in the subject of religious studies, without being religious, self-righteous, or condescending...." Read more
"...Prothero's book filled some holes in my knowledge, and provided some myth-busting that surprised me...." Read more
Customers find the book well written and easy to read, with one customer noting its comprehensive glossary.
"...Highly, highly recommended, and very readable." Read more
"Reading, Writing, Arithmetic and Religion. When I was in elementary school, I often asked, "Why do I have to do this?"..." Read more
"Prothero is a genius! He writes well, has a new "paradigm" for study of comparative religions..." Read more
"...So this book is a much-needed resource, to give us the basics...." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 5, 2009My friends, "Is this what you are looking for?" I guess that if you are looking for something in specific and you do not get it you might feel disappointed. Perhaps sometimes we are looking for shortcuts to gaining huge amounts of knowledge, and actually I think there aren't many. Knowledge and wisdom are acquired through a lifetime process in which each one of us need to embark in a quest for it, not necessarily depending upon one book only. What I mean is that religion, which is the theme that concerns us now and that is dealt with in this book, is a topic much too deep to be discussed in one book speaking of each of them individually. My opinion is that each religion therefore should be analyzed independently in texts written by people well versed in each of them and that actually they profess, so the information is not biased.
That said, the question is, "does this book delivers what it was intended to?" I guess so, since I think that the purpose of this book basically to lead us to the understanding of the fact that we are a nation with a shameful religious ignorance that should be addressed efficiently and in a a timely manner, not only by the state, but by ourselves, and establishes the responsibility we as citizens of a multicultural society have towards it. It actually establishes the importance of such knowledge in terms of understanding the international conflicts our nation is involved in and the basics of our neighbors religions that don't necesarily has the same set of beliefs we do, in order to live together in peace with each other. It does not indicate, by any means that it is the only problem that we have, as someone suggested. There are other issues to address but there are also people with expertise in those other areas that should rather write and convince the nation upon the need to understand them and to fight for those other causes. We are voters and have a voice and thus a power that can influence our government in one way or the other. Therefore, with this information at hand we should get better educated so that we can confront the ignorance that has been taught to us.
I think that the book actually tells us that there are many facts, mainly and mostly historical, that we actually ignore about our nation, the way it was founded and the laws that rules it. All of these facts should be pondered since there are actions been taken upon the misinterpretation of such laws taking advantage of our own ignorance to fulfill such purposes. We have to open our eyes towards these issues and take action.
The title of the book is ironic since it is titled "Religious Literacy..." and basically it points out the contrary, "that we are very illiterate regarding religion." So what we need to know is answered; We need to know more about every religion professed in our country. What we doesn't know... well the previous premise tells us. We do not know the basics of world religion, therefore we are subject to believe what anyone wants to tell us wether it is true or not. We actually do not have the basic knowledge to discern the truth from the lie. Buy it and don't expect to get every answer about every religion. To the contrary, expect to understand the reasons why we should be more Religious literate.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2008What a fantastic book! I am hoping someday to budget for copies on CD (audio) to give as gifts to friends in church and elsewhere who are also interested in American culture and education.
This is not a comparative religions primer, nor does it claim to be. It is something more original, and much more needed. Without apparent bias, and with appropriate vocabulary, Prothero traces a history of American religious literacy. So many people learned to read by reading the Bible, and so many early primers were full of Bible stories and references. There didn't used to be the vast amount of reading material that we take for granted today. There didn't used to be the carefree approach to what we read, either.
Thirty years ago, I remember feeling ignorant when my friends discussed their religious education (Jewish and Catholic - I am Protestant). Today, not only are we ignorant, but we don't even realize how ignorant we are, nor why it is important. A culture needs, not just a shared language, but a shared set of stories, in order to communicate. There are so many references, in politics especially, to scriptural stories, but we are no longer a nation with a shared bank of tales.
How did this happen and why is it important? That's what this book is about. I think that the real value of his work here is in clarifying the situation itself. So I also think that some of the reviewers are missing the point when they nit-pick about Prothero missing this or that sect. Also, for me, this book also explains a lot of things that I have encountered, which are basically facets of the growing state of American anti-intellectualism, and now that I can see them explained and delineated, while they are still frustrating, at least I have a better sense of what is going on.
Highly, highly recommended, and very readable.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 15, 2024I haven’t actually finished reading this book but it is very interesting so far. Maybe I’ll modify my review once I finish it.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2007Reading, Writing, Arithmetic and Religion. When I was in elementary school, I often asked, "Why do I have to do this?" and "Why can't I just work on stuff I'm going to need in real life?" Now that I'm living real life as an adult, I see how essential things like Bible stories, nursery rhymes, learning to count money for my piggy bank and memorizing multiplication tables really are for life as an effective, functional, contributing adult citizen.
The author is able to engage the reader in the subject of religious studies, without being religious, self-righteous, or condescending. He brings up many more points about basic knowledge of facts and subjects that have been abandoned by the educational system that results in a less-than-informed citizenry and the dire consequences of a population that may end up voting against their own interests.
This is an excellent book, easy to digest and even easier to spread the word about. Read it, think about it and tell others.
Top reviews from other countries
- michael e. charronReviewed in Japan on May 20, 2021
5.0 out of 5 stars Nice price
Great book
- EvansReviewed in the United Kingdom on October 13, 2015
5.0 out of 5 stars Should be compulsory reading for all Americans who claim to be Christians
Excellent book. This should be required reading - especially for anyone standing for office, or voting, in the USA. It should certainly be compulsory for anyone claiming to be a Christian.
Prothero explains the problem - near complete ignorance of the religion so many Americans claim to follow, and complete ignorance of any other - with great clarity.
Lot's of useful resources.
I got a colleague - a regular church-attender (in fact, an ordained minister) - to take the religious knowledge test: he knew absolutely zero about any religion other than Christianity, and scored poorly on Christianity (he could name only four of the ten commandments!).
- M ClarkReviewed in Germany on February 28, 2016
4.0 out of 5 stars An important topic
Prothero's book is a long complaint about the lack of religious literacy in America today. The author is particularly upset because of the supposed importance of religion in modern American society has not led to a better understanding of what people say they believe. The problem with the book is that it is, too a very large degree just saying the same thing over and over again.
There are nevertheless two good reasons to read the book: (1) it shames you into wanting to understand all religions better and (2) it provides some real head-slapping examples of people's total ignorance of the religion they feel strongly about. The book is worth reading for its collection of "bloopers" alone like the statement from students that the epistles were the wives of the apostles.
- Khadijah ManassehReviewed in the United Kingdom on December 11, 2014
5.0 out of 5 stars First class book Book is good if you are into or studying/teaching religious studies/thought
First class book
Book is good if you are into or studying/teaching religious studies/thought. Some very interesting ideas, love it.
- William BennettReviewed in Canada on August 15, 2017
3.0 out of 5 stars Rich in deepities...
Full disclosure up front – The following may take the form of a rebuttal, more than a review.
Stephen Prothero is a professor of religious studies, and in the introduction to “Religious Literacy,” he makes very clear the difference between engaging in religious studies, and preaching. How strange then that a significant fraction of the book reads much like a sermon. It preaches the virtues of religious knowledge, laments its decline, and proffers a solution, while all the time being excessively selective in the enumeration of relevant facts and factors.
The book is roughly a decade old, and a lot has happened since it was written. Yet, I don’t think that the most salient points discussed in the book have changed all that much. The opening chapters outline the author’s interpretation of the ‘problem.’ It seems that a great many US school-children cannot name the four (canonical) Christian gospels, or list the seven pillars of Islam, or recite the four noble truths of Buddhism. (I admit that the last one got me too – I knew they were about suffering, but couldn’t quote them in detail.) The author also throws in some factoids of questionable veracity, such as; “10 percent of American high-school students think that Noah’s wife was Joan… of Arc.” Frankly, I hypothesize that this only suggests that about 9.9 percent of American high-school students saw right through the question and were goading the questioner, but anyway...
Following his selective enumeration of the things that young Americans do not know, (a section entitled “The Problem”), he continues by describing the way things used to be (in a chapter called “Eden”), then proceeds to offer his analysis as to how we got to where we are today; (“The Fall”). The ‘sermon’ is biased heavily toward Christianity – which is in no way the author’s fault. This is the way it was in the USA. Religion did indeed, and most unquestionably, play an enormous role in the past. Stephen Prothero is absolutely correct in his observation that in America, as well as Europe, and other nations which are the offspring of European colonialism, the group of faiths which had the greatest impact on history could be collectively referred to as Christianity. Where I do criticize the author is in his implication, not explicitly stated but not at all subtle, that the past religious ‘Eden’ in America represented some sort of a halcyon heritage, and that ‘The Fall’ from this supposed ideal is like another fall of man.
From my own perspective (as admittedly defined by my own subjective prejudices), I argue that any individual human’s most persistent enemy is time. Whether we are children or adults, or, as I happen to be, “hoary with the hair of eld” (Google it), there are unmerciful constraints allotted upon the hours of our lives. We must prioritize everything, including the elements that make up the syllabus of our education. So very long ago in my formative years, I was instructed in the Christian faith. In those days, which the author refers to as the “Eden”, the Lord’s Prayer was recited every morning in my public school, and we were subjected to a carefully cherry-picked Bible reading over the crackling public address system. I truly cannot say that tales of any god, or threats of any hell, contributed manifestly to the successes or failures in my life, but I do freely admit, as the author correctly argues, that my understanding of history, literature and other media, has been positively enhanced by my religious literacy.
Nevertheless, given the demands upon our all too finite hours, I am in general agreement with the admittedly difficult decisions that have relegated religious knowledge to a lesser importance in the modern age. Still, it is not all bleak for religion. That same modernity means that any individual wishing to learn more about any world religion can find libraries of information (and disinformation) no more remote than their nearest Internet-connected device. Usually, it is in their own pocket. I would not condone the dedication of valuable school time to the subject, especially in light of other deficiencies in education, many of which, (in my subjective evaluation at least,) appear significantly more dire. There is even a suggestion (in a later chapter) that the time to teach religion could be found at the expense of mathematics. This is the author quoting someone else, not speaking himself, but the fact that he would even include such a quote in his book is worrying.
By way of illustration, there is apparently a recent study, (which various news sources choose not to link,) stating that 4 out of 5 students in Oklahoma City can’t tell time on an analog clock. Regardless of the doubtful veracity of this news, (one source was FOX), I have witnessed this specific ignorance several times myself – youth and young adults stating unashamedly that they “can’t tell time on old clocks”. I personally view the ability to read a clock in the classroom, or in the town square, as far more important than being able to recount the seven pillars of Islam. In similar dismay, I would wager that if one were to ask an average 60-something-year-old to bisect an angle with straightedge and compass, or to use a tape measure to ensure that two pieces of wood are joined squarely, one would be greeted with only blank stares from the vast majority. Why then, in light of this modern eschewing of knowledge in general, does the author expect that everyone will continue to be imbued with a journeyman’s knowledge of religion? Pythagoras will help people build square walls – Moses will not. While religion might indeed have been pivotal in the history of America, so have square walls. And square walls remain critical and relevant today.
After defining his view of the problem, the author offers a solution. He points out, entirely correctly, that there is nothing unconstitutional in America about teaching about religion in public schools, so long as the lessons do not become vehicles for indoctrination. He also observes, quite correctly, that most teachers steer almost completely clear of religion. He then quotes a study suggesting that three-quarters of Americans would not object to the study of world religion in schools. Conversely, that means that one quarter would object. The parents of 25% of the students in any particular class would be opposed to this type of instruction. In a class of 30, the parents of 7 or 8 of them would be angered; some threatening lawsuits, some pulling their children out of school, etc. One can certainly understand why teachers don’t want to touch this with a ten-foot pole. Furthermore, it is unreasonable to expect a teacher with no specialized education in religious studies to be entirely objective on such a matter. Many – one might even estimate, the majority – of teachers will have personal beliefs and prejudices, and these will be brought into the classroom, either intentionally or subconsciously. I myself probably couldn’t teach such a course without eventually betraying my personal views. The author states that the fear of controversy over religious studies is overblown – I argue that it is understated.
If an elementary- or high-school educator were to put together a basic course on religion – for simplicity’s sake, let’s just say a segment focusing on the Christian Bible – what parts would he/she be expected to teach? Would the syllabus include the story of Jephthah murdering his beloved daughter to please God? Or of Jesus telling slaves to obey their masters? Do we lecture on the rape of Tamar, and how she was thereafter forced to “remain desolate” for the rest of her days? What about how the world will end with seven-headed, ten-horned dragons? Do young kids learn about the law stating that those engaging in homosexual acts shall be put to death, or that a rape victim must marry her rapist? Or that only 144,000 will ever get into heaven, everyone else being doomed to burn for all eternity? Somehow, I think that in most schools, all of these subjects would be censored in favour of the Sermon on the Mount or the Ten Commandments. Of course, I know that most Christians do not believe in many of the dark tales in the Bible, but most do believe in, for example, the resurrection of Jesus. So, which stories are to be taught? Generally, the response to that question is that one should teach exactly as much of the Bible as, either, a) – the teacher, or course designer, personally believes in, or, b) – as portrays the Christian religion in a positive, peace-loving, charitable light, thereby offending no one. While the example of the Christian Bible is cited, the same could be stated for any religious text or concept. Sure, higher education at the university level might succeed at breaking through these constraints, but such fully-rounded teaching of religion is not going to occur in an elementary setting.
Cherry-picking religion is surely worse than not teaching it at all. I argue that it better serves the duty of the pursuit of truth to offer no instruction on the subject of religion, rather than to spout misleading, out of context snippets designed to create a sugar-coated misunderstanding. (That’s what churches and other places of worship are for.) By way of analogy, most Americans received very little elementary-school instruction on, for example, the history of the City of Warsaw. Would we be right to simply describe the lovely parks and museums found there today and leave it at that, without mentioning WWII or the Communist era? That would be more dishonest than simply saying that there is no time to teach about the history of Warsaw.
Those who have an interest in religion, either in an academic sense or a theological one, have a plethora of opportunities to find information, especially in our modern, connected world. Every child or adult with access to the Internet can have his or her own Bible, or any other holy book that may be desired. Their local library probably has a book or two about world religions, or even about the history of Warsaw.
Later in the tome, there is a dictionary of religious terms and concepts. It is largely useless. Even in my youth, we had Encyclopædia Britannica, and now, we have Wikipedia. Either of these sources, along with many others, can offer simple summaries such as those presented therein. It is unworthy of a book authored by a distinguished professor of religious studies to reduce the complexity of religion to such banalities.
Despite all said above, I do sympathize somewhat with of the author’s frustration over America’s lack of religious literacy. But I see this as one aspect of a broad illiteracy; one spanning a multitude of subjects. Not all learning is done in school. Today, with vast libraries at the fingertips, people of all ages can study any subject that interests them. I absolutely accept that religion is a perfectly valid subject for such independent study, but so are many other equally valid subjects.
Perhaps a joy in learning, a reveling in knowledge, is an attitude we should strive to impart on young people. We could give them input on the the direction of their elective studies, with some sage guidance from their elders. I know that such a concept is pie-in-the-sky, but drilling facts into youthful brains by rote, simply to prepare them for the next test, is not a productive alternative. Even if we can’t obtain such a lofty ideal, would not future generations better served if we worked toward it, instead of away.
Stephen Prothero’s book made me think, and any book that succeeds at doing this is not a terribly bad book. I’ve given it a middling rating since it is well written – neither condescending nor unnecessarily technical, and it does put forward some factual, and some controversial points. If the matters it touches upon are of interest to an individual, it is worth a read.