Buy new:
$59.39$59.39
FREE delivery Monday, April 14
Ships from: Silver Arrow Stores Sold by: Silver Arrow Stores
Save with Used - Good
$32.93$32.93
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Zippy Goods

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The Outer Limits of Reason: What Science, Mathematics, and Logic Cannot Tell Us First Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
An exploration of the scientific limits of knowledge that challenges our deep-seated beliefs about our universe, our rationality, and ourselves.
Many books explain what is known about the universe. This book investigates what cannot be known. Rather than exploring the amazing facts that science, mathematics, and reason have revealed to us, this work studies what science, mathematics, and reason tell us cannot be revealed. In The Outer Limits of Reason, Noson Yanofsky considers what cannot be predicted, described, or known, and what will never be understood. He discusses the limitations of computers, physics, logic, and our own thought processes.
Yanofsky describes simple tasks that would take computers trillions of centuries to complete and other problems that computers can never solve; perfectly formed English sentences that make no sense; different levels of infinity; the bizarre world of the quantum; the relevance of relativity theory; the causes of chaos theory; math problems that cannot be solved by normal means; and statements that are true but cannot be proven. He explains the limitations of our intuitions about the world -- our ideas about space, time, and motion, and the complex relationship between the knower and the known.
Moving from the concrete to the abstract, from problems of everyday language to straightforward philosophical questions to the formalities of physics and mathematics, Yanofsky demonstrates a myriad of unsolvable problems and paradoxes. Exploring the various limitations of our knowledge, he shows that many of these limitations have a similar pattern and that by investigating these patterns, we can better understand the structure and limitations of reason itself. Yanofsky even attempts to look beyond the borders of reason to see what, if anything, is out there.
- ISBN-100262019353
- ISBN-13978-0262019354
- EditionFirst Edition
- PublisherMit Pr
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2013
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions1.5 x 6.5 x 9.25 inches
- Print length403 pages
Frequently purchased items with fast delivery
Editorial Reviews
Review
believes to be the philosophical limitations of science. It is enjoyable ride...
-Nature
This fascinating account describes the limitations of reasoning...Popular science readers will enjoy the well-written section explaining experiments in quantum theory... For centuries, humans' basic intuitions about the behavior of nature have been proven wrong, and now there is growing evidence in many fields showing that unavoidable limits exist to prevent people from eventually understanding it all. Researchers will appreciate the great selection of diagrams, complete bibliography and notes section, and useful index. Summing Up: Highly recommended.
- Choice
Yanofsky makes problems and questions that should make your headache delightful to read and think about.
-Slate
Phenomenal Book... Before picking up this book I'd not heard of "Noson Yanofsky," so I was astounded that this is the best, most lucidly-written volume for lay readers I've ever encountered on the underlying or foundational topics I most enjoy, related to mathematics; including issues that cross the boundaries of math, logic, philosophy, physics, and computer science.
- Math Tango
Winner of the 2013 PROSE Award in Popular Science & Mathematics, Association of American Publishers
From the Author
About the Author
Noson S. Yanofsky is Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Science at Brooklyn College and The Graduate Center of the City University of New York. He is a coauthor of Quantum Computing for Computer Scientists.
Product details
- Publisher : Mit Pr; First Edition (January 1, 2013)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 403 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0262019353
- ISBN-13 : 978-0262019354
- Item Weight : 1.53 pounds
- Dimensions : 1.5 x 6.5 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,477,942 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #887 in Mathematics History
- #3,953 in Mathematics (Books)
- #5,172 in History & Philosophy of Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Noson S. Yanofsky is Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Science at Brooklyn College and The Graduate Center of the City University of New York. He lives in Brooklyn with his wife and four children.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book thought-provoking, particularly praising its examination of several areas of thought and its excellent job exploring the limits of reason. Moreover, the book is readable, with one customer noting it's written for a general audience, and customers appreciate its humor. However, the clarity of the writing receives mixed reviews.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find the book thought-provoking, appreciating its interesting examination of various areas of thought and how it explores the limits of reason.
"...Each topic can be further researched and all are interesting overviews of where our knowledge fundamentally hits ceilings...." Read more
"...On the positive side, there are uncanny successes of reason, such as the reliability of induction, the success of mathematics as a language in which..." Read more
"...It will also expose you to the philosophical debate about the curious relationship between math, science and consciousness, without having to plow..." Read more
"...mathematics but writes in a way that makes these topics accessible to an intelligent layperson who need not have studied advanced math or physics...." Read more
Customers find the book readable and interesting, with one noting it is written for a general audience.
"...I enjoyed reading much in this book." Read more
"...itself is entertaining and edifying, and it’s probably the best part of the book...." Read more
"...Although written for a general audience, it would be helpful to have some background in math and science beyond a few long-ago semesters in high..." Read more
"...This work treats the different areas of language, computer science, mathematics and physics on their terms before offering insightful comments at..." Read more
Customers appreciate the book's humor, with one mentioning how it makes the content more entertaining.
"...and humor to make this book more entertaining rather than scientific...." Read more
"...( the exposition being an explication of its title), I found it somewhat reassuring and worth taking into account as a way out of "fairy tales..." Read more
"...The last paragraphs sound apologetic and try to cheer up the reader.Inquisitiveness needs support here" Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the clarity of the book, with some praising its excellent writing, while others find it too detailed or obscure.
"...He will take you through philosophical limits, computing complexities and impossibilities, scientific limits including chaos and aspects of quantum..." Read more
"A fascinating read. Author's approach is lucid and engaging, even though at times a little too detailed...." Read more
"...He then demonstrates this by failing to adequately describe things in all subsequent chapters. There are many explainers of complicated..." Read more
"...done a superb job of framing excellent questions and patiently explaining possible solutions, as well as how those possibilities become problematic...." Read more
Reviews with images

A paradox's paradise
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 25, 2014Much of what science focuses on is reductionism and in particular the goal of reducing the world to the bare minimum of assumptions and postulates that can then be built up into all the complexity we see and feel. The outer limits of reason looks at the limits of what we can know and what we can reduce. It looks at lots of different ideas separately and analyzes lots of different forms of limitations that we must deal with. I'll give a quick overview of the subject matter.
The author starts out by looking at limits to logical consistency in our evolved language. He looks at some repurcussions of paradox's on self referencing sentences and shows how such systems can be looked at symbolically. The author then starts discussing how there are many ideas which do not have a platonic ideal and that their meaning is effectively subjective. The author discusses an eroding artifact that is refurbished and questions at one point is the original not considered the same as the remaining. There is no right answer to such a question. The author discusses Zeno and some of the issues we face when considering infinity. The author ends the chapter by considering logic methods that can accomodate that we humans dont define every object or word precisely before using, in particular systems like fuzzy logic. Where truth values can be indeterminate. The author then moves onto set theory and looks at Cantor's analysis of infinity. Countable infinity is considered as well as uncountable infinity and the ladders above infinity created by power sets. These treatments are self contained in the book though some outside knowledge wouldnt hurt. The author then moves onto the limits of computation in particular polynomial time problems as well as NP problems. The author considers the problems associated with figuring out the travelling salesman problem and then frames other problems relative to one another in terms of difficulty and shows how many are in fact equivalent. The author's goal is to show how some problems which are easy to state currently only have solutions which can be found in times that are longer than the age of the universe and that quantum computation would not be the answer to solving such problems. The author then moves onto basic computation theory and Turing's halting problem. He shows how there can be no program which knows whether a given input program with a given input will compute in finite time. He uses counting arguments from a previous argument to show how this works and as such starts to refer to earlier material. The author then discusses the hierarchy of larger and larger systems for which one cannot solve the halting problem even with the help of divine oracles. The author moves on to the limits of what can know physically. He discusses both chaos and quantum mechanics and discusses how the precision needed to know initial conditions is a fundamental constraint in being able to predict a clockwork universe and discusses how separately quantum mechanics makes particle dynamics fundamentally uncertain as a separate limitation. The author then discusses science and philosophy and how science has philosophical limits imposed on it. He discusses how induction is used as a principal to "prove" our scientific postulates which then form the bedrock of the emergent theory dependent on those postulates. We have no proof that at some point experiments might not repeat themselves as they have in the past. The author discusses the relationship between science and math and is very well measured about why and how there are relationships and what to make of them. He discusses the anthropic principle and its scientific worth. The author then focuses on some more purely mathematical ideas like the real numbers, rational, irrational and within that algebraic and transcendental numbers, he discusses group theory and goes back to computation and then covers some pure logic and arithmetical systems and some of Godel's ideas. The author goes into how mathematical systems cannot deduce whether all statements about a given system can be shown to be true or false and that there are limits to knowledge about any given system irrespective of how many assumptions/axioms are included.
There are a lot of different ideas the author discusses when familiarizing the reader with many of the limits of logic and reason we are fundamentally faced with. The author discusses grammar systems where terms are not all well defined, he discusses the problems associated with continuous space and motion on that space, he discusses chaos and quantum mechanics as well as the difficulty of computability of many easy to state problems- some due to time constraints others more fundamentally by the limits of what we can know. The author covers the limits of logic being able to answer all questions posed within any given mathematical system. A lot of information and thought has gone into this and one can learn a lot from this book. Each topic can be further researched and all are interesting overviews of where our knowledge fundamentally hits ceilings. I enjoyed reading much in this book.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2020I was hoping for two major discussions in Yanofsky’s book.
First, a survey of paradoxes and other conundrums, frustrations, etc. having to do with the limits of “reason” as a tool for understanding the world. And then a probably very speculative analysis to find themes and maybe some theoretical conjectures about how we might tie together and understand those limits.
We get much more of the first than the second. Yanofsky takes us through a fascinating survey of paradoxes and other types of limitations. He starts with the simple liar’s paradox — “I am lying”. The statement is true if false and false if true. The liar’s paradox is one example of problems we run into with self-reference, when we speak about speaking, calculate about calculating, compute about computing, . . .
Yanofsky’s survey is organized into chapters on language, philosophy, infinity, computing, science, metascience, and math.
As he takes us through those different domains, it’s interesting to try to find your own common themes cutting across them. You can categorize and reflect on them in many different ways, such as:
- There are paradoxes, like the liar’s paradox, which is false if true and true if false (i.e., implies a contradiction)
- Limits to knowledge, like deterministic but unpredictable phenomena, like the three body problem in physics
- Things that just aren’t the way we normally think about them, like quantum mechanical reality — superpositions and entanglement — or, a very different example, the Monty Hall problem
- Limits to the feasibility of calculation or computability, like the traveling salesman problem
- Limits to calculability itself, like the Halting Problem
- Vagueness that defies reduction to precision, such as the sorites or heap paradox
- And there is reason’s reliance on apparently unreasonable principles, such as the problem of induction
- On the positive side, there are uncanny successes of reason, such as the reliability of induction, the success of mathematics as a language in which to describe physical reality, and the precise but seemingly fragile suitability of the universe for the evolution of intelligent, reasoning creatures in the first place
Yanofsky offers his own categorization of all of these paradoxes and problems in his final chapter, Beyond Reason:
- Physical Limitations, like time travel (which I’m sure some readers would want to dispute, whether successfully or not)
- Mental-Construct Limitations, like Zeno’s paradoxes
- Practical Limitations, like the traveling salesman problem
- Limitations of Intuition, like quantum indeterminacy or entanglement
Don’t worry if you don’t know what these problems and paradoxes are. Yanofsky provides short, usually very clear, explanations of each. The survey itself is entertaining and edifying, and it’s probably the best part of the book.
What I don’t think Yanofsky really does is tie all of this into a theoretical statement about the limitations of reason. He gives something of a prescription for how to stay safely within the bounds of reason, by not following reason down a path of implication toward contradictions or “false facts.” And, also in that final chapter, he reminds us that reasoning, or science (since much of what he means by “reason” is bound to science), isn’t the only way we have of relating to the world and of coping with its mysteries. He excludes art, morality, religion, and others from the discussion of the bounds of reason.
It’s a little beside the point of Yanofsky’s book, but one remark about the place of morality (and art) vis a vis reason left me jaw-dropped. In fact his blithe treatments of philosophical problems like nominalism, realism, and naive realism surprised me, given that Yanofsky actually seems well-read in the history of those problems. But here's the zinger, where he distinguishes problems like the Halting Problem in computability as something having to do with objective features of reality, as opposed to “some subjective, wishy-washy idea like artistic taste or morality.” Morality is “subjective” and “wishy-washy?”
Like I said, that’s kind of beside the point of the book, but I was so gobsmacked by the remark that I couldn’t let it go.
Back to the core concern of the book. I can’t shake the feeling that by focusing with Yanofsky on what we might call “formal” reasoning, we are missing something in a more mundane sense of “reason” and “reasoning.”
For example, in an everyday use of “reasons,” you may or may not have reasons for what you do or what you say or what you believe. That’s not quite the same sense of “reasons” as Yanofsky’s more formal sense, as employed in scientific, logical, philosophical, or mathematical reasoning.
And in that ordinary sense, we aren’t especially surprised, much less dismayed, that our reasoning isn’t perfect or that it doesn’t lead to optimal outcomes. Of course, reasoning isn’t perfect. We may have reasons for what we do, say, or believe, but we’re often wrong. That’s life. We are only human.
That perspective, as distinct from Yanofsky’s focus on more formal reasoning, seems to accord with a remark by David Hume, quoted by Yanofsky — “What peculiar privilege has this little agitation of the brain which we call thought, that we must thus make it the model of the whole universe?”
Yanofsky’s examples tend to gather around theoretical contexts — physics, mathematics, logic, . . . Nothing wrong with that, but a more rounded diet of what we call “reasoning” would, I think, include examples in which we would have more of the “Well of course” reaction to the limitations of reason than a reaction of surprise.
In fact, it may be worth thinking about whether or not the more formal senses of “reasoning” aren’t an extension of the more mundane senses , but now with unrealistic expectations.
It’s a good book, and I hope i’ve demonstrated that it is thought-provoking.
I’d also recommend a couple of other books on themes I’ve touched on a little. One is Dan Ariely’s The Upside of Irrationality, which concerns the more practical sense of “reason.” His focus is on systematically irrational decision-making, especially in consumer behavior. His discussion there is entertaining and demonstrates how our decision-making sometimes has only the appearance and not the substance of rationality.
I also recommend something very different — Paul Feyerabend’s The Tyranny of Science — on that final point Yanofsky only briefly touches, that science is just one way of relating to and making sense of the world. Feyerabend is a notorious opponent of science as the one and only, or the superior way of understanding reality. And that book is particularly focused on opening minds to both the limitations of scientific reasoning and the alternatives that often compete in its shadow.
Top reviews from other countries
-
Alan Rodriguez GonzalezReviewed in Mexico on December 5, 2019
5.0 out of 5 stars Excelente libro de divugación científica
Gran libro para todo aquél que tenga interés por la ciencia. Dada la naturaleza de la misma, hay conocimiento que está más allá de su alcance.
- AlexWReviewed in Australia on November 11, 2016
5.0 out of 5 stars Essential reading
A must-read for thoughtful people, and very well written.
-
Dr. med. S. AschkenasyReviewed in Germany on November 17, 2015
5.0 out of 5 stars Einfach genial
Dies ist eines der besten Bücher die ich in den letzten Jahren gelesen habe. Wunderbar einfach und klar dargelegt werden die Grenzen der komplexesten Fachgebiet der Wissenschaft wie auch die Philosophie der Wissenschaft selbst aufgezeigt. Es liest sich wie ein Krimi und ist doch einfach "nur" Mathematik und Physik sowie Philosophie.
- A CustomerReviewed in the United Kingdom on September 21, 2014
5.0 out of 5 stars If you think this is going to be the familiar popular science tropes, please be assured this is a fairly original work
Great book. Very well written with some very interesting points to be made. If you think this is going to be the familiar popular science tropes, please be assured this is a fairly original work well worth a weekend of your time.
- Kindle CustomerReviewed in India on November 27, 2018
5.0 out of 5 stars The most simple & lucid explanations of arguably the most abstruse principles in Sciemce & Logic!
Amazing book! I have probably read the book thrice and continue to return to specific chapters for ready-reckoning. Prof. Yanofsky is able to explain extremely tricky subjects (minefields of paradoxes that relativity, logic and quantum mechanics are) with spectacular simplicity! Such simplicity, I am convinced, can come only to one who understands the subject completely! Other books on these subjects (Penrose, Hofstadter, Hawking) tend to digress, prevaricate, and over simplify easy things while expecting the reader to intuit the hard ones (that the authors invariantly gloss over). What makes this book delectable is that it ties disparate subjects -- physics, sciences and math -- with a common thread, namely the limits of reason they all stumble upon. To appreciate that limitation, one needs to know the foundations of relativity, quantum mechanics and logic as would a grad student! Yonofsky straddles all these subjects and guides the reader gently, by hand, to the edge of the precipice from where the view of the cosmos is just breathtaking! If the reader is philosophical minded, he will not be the same person after reading this book!
This is among the top ten best books of my life!
P.S. I read this book to learn about the implications of Godel's theorems. At the end of the book, Yonofsky warns that the theorems should not be carelessly employed to make pronouncements about the sciences, universe, whatever. Ha ha, that was funny, but a welcome reprimand for I was guilty of it!