To see product details, add this item to your cart. You can always remove it later.
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.

Archival Methods Medium-Weight White Cotton Inspection Gloves Large, 12-Pack

4.3 4.3 out of 5 stars 308 ratings

To see product details, add this item to your cart. You can always remove it later.

Purchase options and add-ons

Brand Archival Methods
Size Large (Pack of 12)
Color White
Unit Count 12 Count
Item Dimensions LxWxH 8 x 4 x 2.2 inches

About this item

  • White Cotton Gloves - Large - Package of 12 Pairs

Frequently bought together

$12.95 ($1.08/Count)
Get it Mar 27 - Apr 1
Only 2 left in stock - order soon.
Ships from and sold by Adorama.
+
$17.99
Get it as soon as Monday, Mar 25
In Stock
Sold by CONTINENTAL SUPPLY and ships from Amazon Fulfillment.
+
$14.95 ($7.48/Fl Oz)
Get it as soon as Wednesday, Mar 27
In Stock
Sold by Wholesale Memory and ships from Amazon Fulfillment.
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Details
Added to Cart
Some of these items ship sooner than the others.
Choose items to buy together.

Product Description

This 12-pack of bleached, large Medium-Weight White Cotton Inspection Gloves from Archival Methods prevents oil from contacting artwork or documents. These comfortable gloves feature a hemmed wrist and are machine washable

Product information

Technical Details

Additional Information

Feedback

Archival Methods Medium-Weight White Cotton Inspection Gloves Large, 12-Pack


Found a lower price? Let us know. Although we can't match every price reported, we'll use your feedback to ensure that our prices remain competitive.

Where did you see a lower price?

URL:
Price: ($)
Shipping cost: ($)
Date of the price:
/
/

Store name:
City:
State:
Price: ($)
Date of the price:
/
/


Please sign in to provide feedback.

Looking for specific info?

Customer reviews

4.3 out of 5 stars
4.3 out of 5
308 global ratings

Customers say

Customers like the performance, value, and lint of the protective glove. For example, they mention that it works well for the purpose, is great value for the price, and doesn't leave linte. They appreciate comfort, and versatility. That said, opinions are mixed on the quality and fit.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

31 customers mention31 positive0 negative

Customers like the performance of the protective glove. They say it works well for the purpose, is great value for money, and is great for working with photos. Some mention that it works fine for document handling, but not typing.

"I consider theses gloves to be a good product fo the price...." Read more

"...For that, they're a great product at a good price." Read more

"...in Sri Lanka, are exactly what they are supposed to be, and will do their job reliably, even in warm conditions because they will be cool, healthy..." Read more

"Works as expected. My sister uses to handle old photos and film slides." Read more

29 customers mention29 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the value of the protective glove. They mention that it works well and that they get a lot of pairs for the price.

"...All this being said, they are fairly priced, and the dexterity is good! They will serve the purpose I bought them for, so I am happy...." Read more

"These gloves are great, and the price is definitely right...." Read more

"...oddly proportioned (or maybe that's just my hands) but these are cheap and not meant as a fashion statement...." Read more

"Great bargain...." Read more

19 customers mention15 positive4 negative

Customers like that the protective gloves don't leave lint. They say that the gloves keep their hands clean and are virtually linte-free.

"...They are virtually LINT-FREE and keep smudges off your scanner glass, photos, and negatives. For that, they're a great product at a good price." Read more

"...They are inert and will not harm your valuables. Washable so they can be reused multiple times...." Read more

"...They're very soft and comfortable, and I have not noticed them leaving lint behind." Read more

"These are much better than i expected. They also wash and dry well. I put them in the machine with lights and then into the dryer...." Read more

10 customers mention10 positive0 negative

Customers like the comfort of the protective glove. They mention that the gloves are soft, hug their hand, and the fabric itself is okay. However, some customers find the sizing to be inconsistent.

"...The fabric itself is OK. But the sizing is pretty inconsistent. I need large to fit my long fingers. Some of the gloves just wouldn't fit at all...." Read more

"...even in warm conditions because they will be cool, healthy and comfortable, where synthetic fabrics would not...." Read more

"I do product photography and cannot work without them.They are kinda comfortable and tolerating all the "abuse" I put them through, I even..." Read more

"...They're very soft and comfortable, and I have not noticed them leaving lint behind." Read more

9 customers mention9 positive0 negative

Customers like the versatility of the protective glove. They mention that it works well in avoiding fingerprints and other residue, and it is virtually lint-free. Customers also say that it keeps smudges off scanner glass, photos, and negatives.

"...They are virtually LINT-FREE and keep smudges off your scanner glass, photos, and negatives. For that, they're a great product at a good price." Read more

"...for photography since they let me work quickly and not worry about fingerprints and smudges. I keep a basket of them on my desk at all times." Read more

"...They work well in avoiding fingerprints and other residue but be aware that wearing gloves reduces dexterity..." Read more

"...- these gloves allow me handle them more freely, and provide better control over Fingerprints & Dust...." Read more

74 customers mention49 positive25 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the quality of the protective glove. Some mention that they are decent, well-made, and much better than expected, while others say that they're thin, poorly made, and fall apart easily.

"...finger, but except for picking a negative out of a sleeve, they do pretty good." Read more

"...and since the fingers are still securely sewn, that isn't a problem for me...." Read more

"...But the pictures of the group turned out fantastic. The gloves are a little sheer and not as quality as would be used for a professional costume..." Read more

"These are great for short projects. They do RIP at the seams after a few hours...." Read more

70 customers mention27 positive43 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the fit of the protective glove. Some mention that the fit was just okay, while others say that the sizing is pretty inconsistent. Some say that they fit loosely and are a little oddly proportioned. However, most find the product to be good enough for their needs.

"...The length doesn't reach far down the wrist but was good enough for what we needed." Read more

"...The cotton is sufficiently lightweight and close-fitting for fine work and a touch screen will respond through this material." Read more

"...The size isn't right. Put them on and make a fist - they'll stretch.They're thin...." Read more

"...The fabric itself is OK. But the sizing is pretty inconsistent. I need large to fit my long fingers. Some of the gloves just wouldn't fit at all...." Read more

11 customers mention3 positive8 negative

Customers are not satisfied with the thickness of the protective glove. They mention that it is very thin, but perfect for their needs.

"...Put them on and make a fist - they'll stretch.They're thin. That's right, that makes it easy to handle negatives and pictures...." Read more

"...I rated them 4 stars because of material thickness, the lacking of cuffs, and the smaller size than what is a standard large." Read more

"...They are thin enough to allow you flexibility. They are inert and will not harm your valuables. Washable so they can be reused multiple times...." Read more

"I found these gloves to be thinner than I had expected. When I wear them I can easily see the color of my skin right through the gloves...." Read more

Sizing is ALL MESSED UP
1 Star
Sizing is ALL MESSED UP
I purchased these gloves to use when handling my ancestors' very old photographs, which were handed down to me. I was disappointed right away.There was a sizing discrepancy right off the bat, which, only continued to get worse, with the more gloves I tried on.Issues, outlined, below.- I ordered 12 pairs of size LARGE gloves.- I received only 11 pairs of WIDELY varying sizes.- The label affixed to the plastic packaging states, "Large," as seen in my video.- A second label inside the packaging states, "X-Large," as seen in my video.- The first glove I tried on was too big, with gaping extra material at the tips of my thumb and pinky fingers. I would definitely not be able to handle OLD, fragile photos using gloves that are too large.- I tried on more gloves and soon had to sort them in case any of them actually fit right. Categories: TOO SMALL, TOO LARGE, DECENT, AND PERFECTTOO SMALL = 1TOO LARGE = 7DECENT = 6PERFECT = 8(missing) = 2So, only 4 pairs of gloves fit perfectly, out of the package of 12 pairs that I was expecting in my order.While I wasn't expecting some kind of professional quality at this price, I actually DID expect to receive the size I ordered, and for there to be the appropriate number of gloves.Is it worth dealing with the return? At this point, likely not. I still haven't made up my mind.I am disappointed, as I was really looking forward to diving into my genealogy project, and beginning to sort these old photos with my relatives who are coming for Thanksgiving. We will not be able to do that now.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on November 24, 2015
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2014
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on February 16, 2015
33 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2014
Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2019
Reviewed in the United States on September 15, 2022
Reviewed in the United States on July 26, 2013
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on April 1, 2023